检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:万磊[1] WAN Lei(Laoshan Branch, Qingdao Bureau of Land and Resources, Shandong266100, China)
机构地区:[1]青岛市国土资源房管崂山国土分局,山东266100
出 处:《国土资源情报》2016年第8期20-25,共6页Land and Resources Information
摘 要:现行土地征收补偿制度下,土地增值收益由政府独享,增值收益与征收补偿的巨额差距,引起农民信访问题增多。文章对土地制度二元结构对比分析,认为将土地增值收益与农民割舍开来,有悖于公平正义的法理要义,也不符合物权价值规律和国际上土地发展的物权设置惯例。作者引入农地发展权视角,探索征地补偿新机制的重构,立意土地物权发展利益重新分配,让农民分享土地增值收益,为落实中央顶层精神和进一步完善我国法制建设提出了建议。Under the current compensation system of land expropriation, the land value-added income is owned exclusively by the government, and the huge gap between the value-added income and the expropriation compensation often results in the increase of farmer petitions. This paper makes a comparative analysis of the dualistic structure of the land system, and deems that separating the land value-added incomes from farmers is not only contrary to the fairness and justice of law, but also fails to conform to the law of value of property fight and international fight setting practices in respect of land development. The writer, from the perspective of farmland development right, explores the reconstruction of the new compensation mechanism for land expropriation, stresses the redistribution of interests with regard to land property rights allows farmers to share the land value-added incomes so as to put forward some suggestions on implementing the top-layer spirit of the central government and further improving the construction of the legal system in China.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.119.102.182