检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:欧阳君君[1] OUYANG Jun-jun(Collaborative Innovation Center of Building Jiangxi under the Rule of Law, Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, Nanchang 330032, Chin)
机构地区:[1]江西财经大学法治江西建设协同创新中心,江西南昌330032
出 处:《海南大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2016年第5期40-48,62,共10页Journal of Hainan University (Humanities & Social Sciences)
基 金:中国博士后科学基金第59批面上资助项目(2016M592105);江苏高校哲学社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(2012JDXM019);福建省软科学研究计划项目(2016R0005)
摘 要:经济发展型征收不同于典型的公益征收。在美国,经联邦最高法院和地方州法院的系列判决,经济发展型征收得以在20世纪下半叶形成与兴起。应该承认,经济发展型征收对于促进地方经济发展确有作用,但是它同时存在诸多弊端。面对公众的担忧与学界的质疑,美国立法机关与司法机关共同做出了种种努力,以抑制经济发展型征收的过度扩张。研究这些问题,可以为人们认识我国的经济发展型征收及其改革提供一个更加客观的角度。The economic development takings are different from the typical public ones. In the USA, the economic development takings, with a series of decisions of the Federal Supreme Court and local state courts, came to form and prosper in the second half of the twentieth century. It should be acknowledged that the economic development takings can indeed promote the local economic development, but still display many drawbacks. Facing the public concerns and the queries of the academia, the US legislative and judicial branches work together with many efforts to control the excessive expansion of economic development takings. Their studies can provide a more objective angle to understand China' s economic development takings and its reform.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.137.203.53