南海仲裁案中国立场的主权理论解读  

Interpretation of the Sovereignty Theory for Chinas Position to the South China Sea Arbitration Case

作　　者：李志文[1] 马玉[1] 

机构地区：[1]大连海事大学,辽宁大连116026

出　　处：《太平洋学报》2016年第9期1-8,共8页Pacific Journal

基　　金：教育部哲学社会科学研究重大攻关项目"中国与邻国海洋权益争端问题的国际法理研究"(12JZD048)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：从主权理论视角剖析南海仲裁案被掩盖的主权问题,现行国际法主权模式实质上是主权绝对性的特殊状态下,国家通过有意识地分化主权内容,放弃或淡化其外围部分以构建有秩序的外部环境,使主权的核心内容得到更好的保护。南海仲裁案属于错误地认识主权的核心内容和滥用强制仲裁程序,从而产生损及主权的越权行为。对此,中国对仲裁结果提出不接受、不参与、不承认的立场,是在自身主权核心内容受到侵害时进行选择的必要保护,这不仅符合国家主权平等原则,而且也从国家主权理论中得到支撑。From the perspective of sovereignty theory, well find that the case of ＂South China Sea Arbitra-tion＂ is the issue of sovereignty which is not covered by compulsory arbitration. The pattern of sovereignty atpresent is a special mode of absolute sovereignty, in essence. Governing body is consciously trying to polar-ize the contents of the sovereignty to set up an orderly exterior environment under which the core content ofthe sovereignty will be well protected. The errors of ＂South China Sea Arbitration＂ are wrongly comprehen-ding the core content of the sovereignty, abusing the compulsory arbitration, and damnifying the sovereigntyof China by act in excess of authority. When the core content of sovereignty was damnified, Chinas positionis a necessary protection which is consistent with the principle of sovereign equality of states and supportedby the theory of sovereignty.

关 键 词：中菲南海仲裁案 中国立场 主权理论 

分 类 号：D990[政治法律—国际法学]