海洋石油污染案件中的纯经济损失赔偿  

The pure economic loss in the marine oil pollution cases

作　　者：盖晓慧[1] 

机构地区：[1]对外经济贸易大学法学院,北京100029

出　　处：《中国海商法研究》2016年第3期99-105,共7页Chinese Journal of Maritime Law

摘　　要：纯经济损失是一个新兴概念,对传统侵权法理论有着极大冲击。侵权法理论和普通法先例对纯经济损失都倾向于不予赔偿,但各法系又不得不承认特例情况下的纯经济损失有赔偿的必要。在研究海洋石油污染赔偿问题时,应明确纯经济损失和间接损失的关系。这种区分,一方面有利于解决传统侵权法理论对间接损失赔偿问题的争议;另一方面有利于厘清海洋石油污染损失赔偿的复杂情形。通过对国际重大海洋石油污染事件的研究,结合国际公约可以分析出纯经济损失赔与不赔的界限。中国应当承认纯经济损失,以弥补传统侵权法理论的不足并解决在应对石油污染损失赔偿中的实践难题。Pure economic loss is a new concept for the system of traditional tort. The trend in both tort law theory and common law precedents tends to support no compensation for pure economic loss,but there are exceptional cases where compensation for pure economic loss should be necessary and this is admitted by various legal systems. When doing the research on the problem of marine oil pollution damages,we should clarify the relationship between pure economic loss and indirect loss. The distinction between pure economic loss and indirect loss,on the one hand,can help to solve the controversial issue of compensation for indirect loss in traditional tort law theory,and on the other hand,can clarify the complex situation of marine oil pollution damages. By analysizing those serious marine oil pollution incidents and applying relevant interntional conventions,we can find the boundary of the compensation for pure economic loss. China should recognize the concept of pure economic loss so as to make up for the theoretical defeciency of its traditional tort law theory and solve the practical problems when assessing oil pollution damages.

关 键 词：纯经济损失 间接损失 石油污染 墨西哥湾 

分 类 号：DF961.9[政治法律—国际法学]