检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张敬坡[1] 冯雷[1] 秦静[1] 郑韬[1] 张传宝[1] ZHANG Jing-po FENG Lei QIN Jing ZHENG Tao ZHANG Chuan-bao(The Second Department of General Surgery, Shijiazhuang the Third Hospital, Shijiazhuang Hebei 050017, China)
机构地区:[1]石家庄市第三医院普外二科,河北石家庄050017
出 处:《江苏大学学报(医学版)》2016年第1期49-53,共5页Journal of Jiangsu University:Medicine Edition
摘 要:目的:比较腹腔镜胃旁路术(laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass,LRYGB)和腹腔镜胃袖状切除术(laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy,LSG)治疗肥胖合并2型糖尿病(type 2 diabetes mellitus,T2DM)的疗效。方法:选择21例肥胖合并T2DM行手术治疗的患者,按术式分为LRYGB组(n=11)和LSG组(n=10),分析两组患者手术前和手术后1、6、12月内糖代谢指标变化;SF-36生命质量量表分析两组患者术后生理健康和精神健康;调查患者术后生活满意度。结果:与术前比较,两组患者手术后1,6,12月空腹血糖、餐后2 h血糖、糖化血红蛋白、胰岛素抵抗指数、空腹C肽、体质量指数水平均明显下降(P均<0.05),而同一时间点两组患者血糖指标间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);LRYGB组术后患者生理功能、总体健康、活力、情感职能和精神健康生较LSG组明显改善(P<0.05),术后12个月生活满意度(90.9%)明显高于LSG组(80.0%,P<0.05)。结论:LRYGB和LSG均是治疗肥胖合并T2DM的可靠方法,但前者患者生活质量优于后者。Objective: To compare the treatment of obesity patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) by laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass(LRYGB) and laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). Methods: Twenty-one obesity patients with T2DM who underwent bariatric surgery were selected in the study, and divided into LRYGB group(n = 11) and LSG group(n = 10). The changes of glucose metabo- lism index in two groups were analyzed before and after operation in 1,6, 12 months. SF-36 scale was used to observe the physical health and mental health of patients after operation. The life satisfactions of patients after operation were also investigated. Results: Compared with pre-operation, fasting plasma gluose, 2 h postprandial blood glucose ( 2hPG), glycosylated hemoglobin ( HbA1c ), insulin resistance index ( HOMA- IR), fasting C-peptide and body mass index(BMI)were significantly decreased at the 1st, 6th and 12th month after surgery in both LRYGB and LGS groups ( P 〈 0.05 ) ; but there were no significant differences between the two groups at the same time(P 〉 0.05 ). SF-36 scale showed that patients physiological function, overall health, energy, emotional function and mental health in LRYGB group were greatly improved than in LSG group( P 〈 0.05 ). The quality of life in LRYGB group was higher than LSG group (90.9% vs 80.0%, P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion: LRYGB and LSG were effective to patients with T2DM, but the life quality of LRYGB was better than LSG.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68