检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:齐喜三[1]
出 处:《南阳理工学院学报》2016年第5期26-29,共4页Journal of Nanyang Institute of Technology
基 金:2012年度河南省科技厅软科学研究项目(122400420008)
摘 要:《道路交通安全法》和《侵权责任法》颁布之后,最高法针对交通事故损害赔偿案件又做出《适用法律司法解释》,明确了道路交通事故赔偿责任主体具体的担责原则。然而面对纷繁复杂的司法实践,游离于法律边缘的赠与行为、出质、维修、保管等行为可以通过扩张解释即可阐明;已有的擅驾、出租行为通过反思与检讨,运用目的解释即可找到答案;未被规制的好意同乘、承包车辆等行为,在区分不同情形的基础上按照控制与风险理论原理予以确定。After the promulgation of"The Law of Road Traffic Safety"and"Tort Liability Law",the Supreme Court has made"applicable law and judicial interpretation"in view of traffic accident damage compensation cases. There has been specific responsibility principle for subject of liability road traffic accidents compensation. However,in the face of numerous and complicated judicial practice,Gift behavior at the edge of law,pledge,maintenance,custody and other acts have been clearly through expansion interpretation.Driving without authorization and rental vehicles behavior have been clearly on the basis of re-examination. As a result,lifts with good intentions and contracting vehicles acts need to be determined urgently.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28