检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高麦爱[1]
机构地区:[1]淮阴师范学院历史文化旅游学院欧美国家边界争端与化解研究中心,江苏淮安223300
出 处:《淮阴师范学院学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年第5期631-638,共8页Journal of Huaiyin Teachers College(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:英国与阿根廷围绕马尔维纳斯群岛的主权之争自第二次世界大战以来一直跌宕起伏,酿成了1982年的英阿马岛战争。西方学术界围绕马岛战争爆发的原因、战争的性质、影响战争的国内外因素、战争的结果与影响展开了热烈的讨论。研究显示,当前国际关系中主权争端的解决尚缺乏清晰的理论或实践依据,军事力量实际扮演着重要角色。讨论中出现的分享主权观点,一定程度上对传统的民族国家主权观形成了挑战。The sovereignty dispute of Malvinas Islands between United Kingdom and Argentina has been ups and downs since WW II of last century. It indeed led to the battle of Malvinas Islands in 1982 between them. This issue has caused heated arguments around the reasons, the natures, domestic and international elements, the results and effects of the battle of Malvinas Islands in western academia. The study shows that there is no clear theory or practical basis to dispose of the disputes of territory and territorial waters in international relations. The military powers have played very important role in these disputes. To some extent, the traditional view on nation sovereignty is challenged by the view about sharing sovereignty produced in arguments.
关 键 词:英阿马岛战争 马岛(福克兰群岛)争端 主权争端
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46