检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:胡嘉金
出 处:《时代法学》2016年第5期83-89,共7页Presentday Law Science
摘 要:庭前会议是法律明确规定的一种庭前程序,主要解决回避、出庭证人名单、非法证据排除(以下简称"非排")等程序性问题。宜将庭前会议设为非排的前置必经程序。法律及司法解释对庭前会议的召集程序、控辩双方非排参与规则规定得比较原则、模糊,导致实践操作比较混乱,需要一一明确,以确保程序顺畅、公开、公正。庭前会议达成的非排"意向"具有法律约束力,当事人既不能反悔,庭审中也不能基于同一理由提出非排申请,而且,一旦庭前会议达成非排意向,控方不能重新提出同类合法证据,并且该非法证据原本拟证明的犯罪事实即视为不存在。控辩双方达成非排意向后,如果出现新情况、新材料,庭审中可以提出异议。对庭审中非排申请处理不服的,控辩双方可以提出上诉、抗诉。Pretrial conference is before a court of law explicitly stipulated procedures, mainly solve the challenge, to appear in court the witness list, illegal evidence exclusion of procedural problems such as. Pretrial conference should be set as a prerequisite for the illegal evidence exclu-sion necessary procedures. Laws and judicial interpretations of the prosecuting and defending parties in court before the meeting shall be convened the procedures, illegal evidence exclusion rules more principle, fuzzy, result in practice is chaotic, need to clear one by one, to ensure smooth applica-tion ,open, fair. Pretrial conference of illegal evidence exclusion “intentionality” is legally binding, the parties can not go back on our word, trial cannot be based on the same reason to apply for illegal evidence exclusion, and, once the illegal evidence exclusion intention court before the meeting, the prosecution can’t resubmit the same kind of legal evidence, and the illegal evidence to prove the criminal facts, as does not exist. After the illegal evidence exclusion intentionality, the prosecuting and defending parties if there is a new situation, new material, trial can be challenged. Not satisfied with the trial of illegal evidence elimination application processing, can the prosecuting and defen-ding parties appealed or protested.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222