论南海仲裁案的非法越权管辖——兼议中国政府“不接受不参与”的正当立场与策略(一)  

On the Illegal Ultra Vires Jurisdiction of South China Sea Arbitration——Concurrent Discussion of the Proper Position and Strategy of Non-acceptance and Non-participation by Chinese Government (1)

作　　者：高菲 

机构地区：[1]中国国际经济贸易仲裁委员会上海办公室,上海200122

出　　处：《时代法学》2016年第5期98-118,共21页Presentday Law Science

摘　　要：就菲律宾对中国提起的南海仲裁案,虽然中国政府明示此涉国家主权仲裁庭无权管辖,仲裁庭还是作出其享有管辖权并受理本案的裁决。鉴于该裁决有片面解释公约、漠视中国立场、偏向菲方、非法越权管辖之嫌,拟逐一剖析裁决各项决定,揭示其非法越权管辖事实及危害。从国家政治外交层面而言,我国不接受不参与的立场是完全正确的,但就策略技术而言,官民若均不参与则有失偏颇,失去全面了解情况、当面驳斥菲不当请求等等方面的最佳机会,易让仲裁庭滥兴"法律沙文主义"越权管辖作出不利中国的管辖权及实体裁决。若既坚持官方不接受不参与原则立场,又可以任何民间方式参与所有程序,两相结合呼应,知彼知己,及时应对,依法对法,见招拆招,绝不相让,则百战不殆,似为上善之策。As to South China Sea Arbitration submitted by the Republic of the Philippines, the Tribunal has made an award deciding it has the jurisdiction no matter how the Chinese Governmenthas already expressed that the case is entirely related to the state sovereignty so that the tribunal has no jurisdiction at all. Considering that the award is suspected of unilateral interpreting the Conven-tion, ignoring Chinese position, partial to the Philippines and illegal ultra vires jurisdiction etc. , this article is intending to analyze decisions of the Award one by one, revealing the truth and harm of the illegal ultra vires jurisdiction, stating concurrently what the Chinese position of non-acceptance and non- participation to defend the state sovereignty is absolutely right as far as political, diplomatic and state, but it is biased if both official and people are all non-participations as far as strategies and techniques; it shall lose best chances to understand the whole situation and refute the inappropriate requests of Philippines face to face, to restrict the Tribunal who may appear biased in due time, to fully persuade the Tribunal to accept China＇s legitimate views in order to get the good results as well as to show the Chinese style and legal soft power to the world; it is easy to let the Tribunal to abuse “legal chauvinism”,ultra vires jurisdiction and make an award on jurisdiction and substances against China, and what is more, it gives grounds for talk damaging the image of China. But if we insist the basic principle position of non-acceptance and non-participation by Chinese government while we may participate in all arbitration procedures in any unofficial way, it shall be the best tac-tics and it is never not too late by combination of two and echoes, knowing enemy and ourselves well, response in time, arguing and refuting according to law, adopted piecemeal and never give up, therefore, we can win the case without dangers.

关 键 词：不接受不参与 民间参与 非法越权管辖 政治外交方式 法律方式 

分 类 号：DF90[政治法律—国际法学]