民营企业家腐败犯罪刑事治理困境与出路  

On the Criminal Judicial Dilemma and Countermeasures against Private Entrepreneur's Corruption Crime

作　　者：操宏均[1] CAO Hong - jun(Research Department of National Prosecutors College of P. R. C, Beijing 102206, China)

机构地区：[1]国家检察官学院科研部,北京102206

出　　处：《河南警察学院学报》2016年第4期20-29,共10页Journal of Henan Police College

基　　金：2016年国家社科基金年度重点项目"非公经济组织腐败犯罪统计调查与合作预防模式研究"(16AFX010);国家检察官学院2016年度科研基金资助一般项目"新形势下检察机关参与民企反腐实践路径"(GJY2016C18)的阶段性研究成果

摘　　要：当前我国民营企业家腐败犯罪数量呈现增长势头,形势较为严峻,并且这类犯罪中以利益交换为基础的贿赂型腐败犯罪尤为突出。实践表明,这类犯罪除了造成较为直观的经济损失之外,还将直接动摇社会的诚信基石,助长"潜规则"滋生蔓延,增加交易成本,传递"负能量"。因此,必须对当前刑事司法中存在的选择性司法、多头执法、"两法衔接"、量刑失衡衍生"低成本高回报",以及案件发现机制不完善等问题进行全面检视,进而通过建立信息共享平台、用好刑事司法裁量权、恪守刑法谦抑精神、大力开发刑罚替代措施,以及增加"企业预防腐败犯罪"的酌定量刑情节等举措,实现民营企业家腐败犯罪刑事司法公正化。The private entrepreneur＇ s corruption crime in China is increasing now and showing a serious trend. Perhaps bribery crime is the most typical one of this kind of crimes. Practice shows that this kind of crime will not only result in more intuitive economic losses, but also directly shake the foundation of social credit, leading to fuel the hidden rule, increase transaction costs and transfer the negative energy. Therefore, we must comprehensively sort out and summarize the flaws of current criminal justice on private entrepreneur＇ s corruption crime, such as the selective justice, law enforcement, ＂the convergence between criminal law and administrative law ＂ , ＂low cost and high return＂ made by the unbalance of sentencing discretion as well as the imperfect case discovery mechanism. I advocated that realizing criminal judicial justice needs to establish the information sharing platform, make good use of criminal judicial discretion, abide by the modestly restraining spirit of criminal, vigorously develop alternative penalty measures and increase the discretionary circumstances of sentencing of ＂ the duty of enterprise to prevent corruption crime＂.

关 键 词：民营企业家腐败犯罪 刑事治理 “企业预防腐败犯罪”酌定情节 

分 类 号：D917[政治法律—法学]