“减少死刑罪名”不是“减少死刑适用罪名”——晚近我国死刑立法改革之反思  

"Reduce the death penalty" Is Not "Reduce the Death Penalty Charges" ——Reflection on the Legislative Reform of The Death Penalty in Our Country in Recent Years

作　　者：姚建龙[1] 王江淮[1] YAO Jian - long WANG Jiang - huai(Shanghai University of Political Science and Law,Shanghai 201701, China)

机构地区：[1]上海政法学院,上海201701

出　　处：《河南警察学院学报》2016年第4期67-72,共6页Journal of Henan Police College

摘　　要："减少死刑罪名"不是"减少死刑适用罪名"。就我国当前状况而言,"备而不用"和"备而少用"仍是应坚持的死刑立法改革路径。《刑法修正案(九)》之后的死刑立法改革不能避重就轻,应将改革的重心放在减少死刑罪名的"适用"而非减少死刑"罪名"之上,尤其是应当针对那些在司法实践中多用、滥用的死刑罪名进行改革。其中,毒品犯罪应尽快取消死刑。＂ Reduce the death penalty＂ is not ＂reduce the death penalty charges＂. ＂Reserved but not used＂ and ＂reserved but less used＂ are the correct approach of death penalty reform in china. After the ninth criminal law amendment, the death penalty reform should focus on reducing the number of applicable death penalty. It is sug- gested that death penalty should be abolished for drug crimes as soon as possible.

关 键 词：减少死刑 死刑立法 死刑政策 

分 类 号：D924.13[政治法律—刑法学]