检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李国梅
机构地区:[1]佛山市南海区第四人民医院,广东佛山528200
出 处:《深圳中西医结合杂志》2016年第17期71-73,共3页Shenzhen Journal of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine
摘 要:目的:探讨胫后动脉比桡动脉、股动脉采血在新生儿科中应用的优劣。方法:选取佛山市南海区第四人民医院新生儿科的100例婴幼儿,将其随机分为4组:胫后动脉组(1组,25例)、桡动脉(2组,25例)、肱动脉(3组,25例)及股动脉(4组,103例)。将3组血肿发生率(A)、成功率(B)、取血时间(C)及取血点发生青紫(D)进行对比。结果:与2组,3组,4组的结果相比,1组的各项评价指标均具有明显优势。结论:1组采血方式的成功率远远高于2、3组,其操作性简便,易于被新手医护人员所掌握。在减轻患儿痛苦,降低不良影响同时可拥有较多的采血部位。Objective To get the advantages of posterior tibial artery blood sampling compared with radial artery blood sampling and femoral artery blood sampling in the department of pediatrics. Methods Four hundred and twelve neonates were randomly divided into three groups: posterior tibial artery (G-l), radial artery (G-2), and femoral artery (G-3), One hundred and three for one group. We compared the success rate, hematoma rate and the area of the puncture point among 3 groups. Results All the evaluating indicators of G-1 are better than G-2 and G-3. Conclusions With the advantages of higher Success rate, fewer adverse effects, easier to control, providing additional blood sampling sites and relieving pain in neonatal patients, posterior tibial artery puncture for blood sampling worth popularizing clinically.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80