检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:钟健[1] 奚雷[1] 张强[1] 陈亮[1] 王滨[1]
出 处:《江苏医药》2016年第19期2136-2138,共3页Jiangsu Medical Journal
摘 要:目的比较经剑突下单操作孔电视胸腔镜手术与传统电视胸腔镜手术对自发性气胸的疗效。方法回顾性分析15例经剑突下单操作孔电视胸腔镜手术(观察组)和49例传统电视胸腔镜手术(对照组)治疗自发性气胸患者的临床资料。结果观察组手术时间较对照组长[(68.74±12.08)min vs.(43.67±6.09)min](P<0.05),术后疼痛评分较对照组低[(2.31±1.35)分vs.(3.40±1.38)分](P<0.05)。两组术中出血量、术后胸腔引流量、术后住院时间、胸管拔除时间及住院总费用差异均无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论经剑突下单操作孔电视胸腔镜手术治疗自发性气胸疗效可靠。Objective To compare the efficacy of subxiphoid single-port video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) with conventional VATS in the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax .Methods The clinical data of 64 patients with spontaneous pneumothorax undergoing subxiphoid single-port VATS(group A ,15 cases) or conventional VATS (group B ,49 cases) were retrospectively analyzed . Results The operation time was longer [(68.74 ± 12.08) min vs .(43.67 ± 6.09) min] ,while postoperative pain score was lower [(2.31 ± 1.35)points vs .(3.40 ± 1.38)points] in group A than those in group B ( P〈0 .05 ) .There were no significant differences in intraoperative blood loss , postoperative chest drainage ,postoperative hospital stay ,chest tube removal time and total hospitalization expenses between two groups ( P〉0 .05 ) .Conclusion The efficacy of subxiphoid single-port VATS is reliable in the treatment of spontaneous pneumothorax .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.46