检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘赛[1] 吕振华[1] LIU Sai LU Zhenhua(Department of Automotive Engineering, Tsinghna University, Beijing 100084, China)
出 处:《清华大学学报(自然科学版)》2016年第10期1104-1108,共5页Journal of Tsinghua University(Science and Technology)
摘 要:已有文献进行了微弓形扁长金属杆在轴向重物冲击下的动态屈曲实验研究,得到了扁长杆冲击屈曲响应的典型结果,但已有文献及后来相关论文的模拟计算精度较低。为了提高典型扁长杆的冲击屈曲特性的计算分析精度,该文研究了扁长杆的冲击屈曲特性分析的有限元建模方法,改进了有限元模型边界条件的建模仿真度(考虑了转动铰配合间隙、摩擦等),并探讨了有限单元型式及尺度的选择,以壳单元或实体单元模型代替梁单元模型。研究表明:采用改进边界条件(考虑转动铰配合间隙、摩擦等)和薄壳单元或厚壳单元或实体单元的仿真模型比采用理想边界条件和梁单元的原模型的计算结果精度显著提高;基于改进模型的计算分析结果,揭示了该扁长杆受冲击载荷作用时的3维动态反向屈曲行为。The dynamic buckling experiment of a belt bar subjected to axial impact was previously studied experimentally. The tests show that previous simulation methods are not very accurate. The finite element analysis accuracy is improved by improving the fidelity of the boundary conditions and properly selecting the finite element type and size. The boundary conditions for the joint clearance and friction are determined by comparing the numerical results with the test data, and shell elements and solid elements are found to give better results than beam elements. Simulations with thin or thick shell elements or solid elements with the new boundary conditions are more accurate than previous results with beam elements and simple boundary conditions. The refined finite element model predicts the 3-D reverse buckling of the belt bar.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222