检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学经济与金融学院,陕西西安710061 [2]财富证券研究发展中心,湖南长沙410005
出 处:《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》2016年第10期103-111,共9页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目<全球经济调整与中国经济发展方式转变研究>(批准号:09XJY011)
摘 要:地方政府间的引资争夺不仅增强了外商谈判的话语权,同时,FDI的非均衡分布加剧了城乡居民经济福利的差异化发展。研究结果显示:整体看,FDI、优惠政策促进了居民经济福利水平的提升;分区域看,FDI、优惠政策对市区居民的经济福利具有显著的积极影响,但对县区居民的影响不明显。与此同时,由于FDI的分布差异及政府的政策偏好,县区居民分摊了过大的社会成本,从而进一步弱化了福利水平的提升。It has enhanced the foreign negotiations for investment competition of local government. At the same time,the unbalanced distribution of FDI has contributed to the different development for economic benefits of urban and rural residents. In this paper,it has been an empirical analysis which the regional distribution of foreign direct investment has differential impact of economic welfare on the urban and rural residents. The results have showed that both FDI and preferential policies have promoted the residents' economic welfare level on the overall look,both FDI and preferential policies have significant positive impact on economic welfare of urban residents,but the impact on the county residents is not obvious from Sub regional. At the same time,due to the distribution differences between FDI and the government's policy preferences,rural residents have shared too much social cost,thereby further weakened the welfare level of ascension.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117