检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈浩[1] 庄启湘[1] 孙岩[1] 郑志勇[1] 秦卫[2] 刘可夫[1] CHEN Hao ZHUANG Qj-xiang SUN Yan et al(Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Suzhou Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Suzhou 215008, Jiangsu Province, China)
机构地区:[1]南京医科大学附属苏州医院放射科,江苏苏州215008 [2]南京医科大学附属苏州医院骨科,江苏苏州215008
出 处:《罕少疾病杂志》2016年第5期51-54,F0002,共5页Journal of Rare and Uncommon Diseases
摘 要:目的探讨比较磁共振3D-SPACE、3D-True FISP序列在膝关节软骨缺损术前分级中的诊断价值。方法对经关节镜证实的膝关节软骨缺损患者43例,于术前一周行3D-SPACE序列和3D-True FISP序列的MRI检查,并与关节镜记录结果进行对照,比较两序列准确显示膝关节软骨缺损的能力。结果 3D-SPACE比3D-True FISP序列能发现更多数目的软骨缺损,且在软骨缺损质量显示方面更好,特别是在Ⅰ,Ⅱ级软骨损伤上两者间有统计学差异(P<0.05)。结论3D-SPACE较3D-True FISP序列在膝关节软骨缺损分级中具有优势。Objective To compare the diagnostic value via imaging quality of the articular cartilage of knee with the 3D-SPACE, 3D-True FISP sequences. Methods Before treated by arthroscope in the next week., 43 patients of knee ioint were examined with 3D-SPACE and 3D-True FISP sequences at 1,ST MRI .Lesion visualization of articular cartilage were compared. Results 3D-SPACE comparing with 3D-True FISP not only finding more numbers of cartilage injury, but also having significant difference between the cartilage injury at level I and level II (P〈0.05). Conclusions Compared with the 3D-True FISP sequence 3D-SPACE sequence can show the knee cartilage iniury better.
关 键 词:磁共振成像 膝关节软骨 可变反转角三维快速自旋回波序列 三维真稳态进动快速成像序列
分 类 号:R445.2[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222