略论谶纬书在《汉志》《隋志》中的区别待遇  

Different Treatment of Confucianism Divination in “Book of Han”and “Book of Sui”

作　　者：湛玉霞 ZHAN Yu-xia(Chongqing University, Chongqing 400044, Chin)

机构地区：[1]重庆大学人文社会科学高等研究院,重庆400044

出　　处：《哈尔滨学院学报》2016年第10期120-125,共6页Journal of Harbin University

摘　　要：谶纬作为中国传统文化的一部分,曾对中国历史进程产生过不容忽视的影响,然而对谶纬此类书,两部在中古时期最具代表性的官修史志目录——《汉书·艺文志》、《隋书·经籍志》态度不一,《汉志》并未著录谶纬书,而《隋志》将其著录入经部。文章以此为切入点,从谶纬起源、谶纬发展脉络、《汉书·艺文志》未著录谶纬书、《隋书·经籍志》著录谶纬书四方面分析讨论相关问题,以期认清谶纬的历史定位。As a part of Traditional Chinese Culture,Confucianism divination had made an important impact on the course of Chinese history. However,the two representative official history catalogues show different attitudes in ＂Book of Han＂and＂Book of Sui＂where it is not included in the former book but included in the latter. Based on this consideration,four aspects——the origin,development,why it is included in ＂Book of Han Art and Literature＂and why it is included in ＂Book of Sui Confucian Classics＂– are discussed.

关 键 词：谶纬 《汉书·艺文志》 《隋书·经籍志》 

分 类 号：K207[历史地理—历史学]