《中国的西北角》《塞上行》版本学研究初探——从《动荡中之西北大局》谈起  

A Bibliographical Study on Northwest Corner of China and Travelling along Frontier——Focusing On Unrest in Northwest as an Example

作　　者：范东升[1] 周弯[1] 

机构地区：[1]汕头大学长江新闻与传播学院

出　　处：《新闻与传播研究》2016年第9期27-39,共13页Journalism & Communication

摘　　要：范长江先生许多作品的"原始版本"并非只有一个,而是有多种不同的版本。如1937年的著名时评《动荡中之西北大局》一文,就有上海大公报、天津大公报和《塞上行》三个不同版本,彼此之间且有明显而重要的差别。但20世纪80年代以后的再版本以及诸多新闻史研究者都误将上海大公报的版本当作了唯一的版本,其实沪版并非记者原作,却恰是记者原稿被删改最多的一个版本。首次提到红军"长征两万五千里"的文章是范长江的《动荡中之西北大局》原稿,但大公报发表该文时将该提法删改掉了。The author of this study has discovered the fact for the first time that there were unknown multi-editions of publications by Fan Changjiang,instead of one supposed 'original' version of him.For example,Unrest in Northwest,a well-known political article by Fan Changjiang in 1937,has been found out three editions from two newspapers,Shanghai TaKungPao,Tientsin TaKungPao and in his book,Travelling along Frontier,with considerable differences from each other.But since 1980 s,publishers and researchers of journalism history have been mistaken to use the edition of Shanghai TaKungPao as only version.In fact Shanghai edition was not the original work by the newspaper reporter,but a radically revised version by the newspaper editor instead.This bibliographical study is trying to analyze the special historical background about the multi-edition of Fan's articles in two books,and compare the differences among them,then to identify which version was the reporter's original draft and what is most likely the 'correct version'.Based on the multi-edition analysis,the author also has found the interesting fact that Fan Changjiang boldly used the political sensitive phrase '25 thousand li Long March of Red Army' in Unrest in Northwest,which was finally deleted by his editor.This study also provides new evidence to explore the reason why Fan Changjiang resigned from TaKungPao in 1938.

关 键 词：范长江 塞上行 大公报 

分 类 号：G219.29[文化科学—新闻学]