检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]广东省广州市第一人民医院,广东广州510180
出 处:《临床医学工程》2016年第10期1314-1315,共2页Clinical Medicine & Engineering
摘 要:目的探讨水银柱血压计与臂式电子血压计的血压测量结果是否存在差异。方法 52例检测对象采用同源配对同时用水银柱血压计和电子血压计测量血压,采用配对t检验比较二者的检测结果。结果水银柱血压计与电子血压计测量血压之差值符合产品质量标准,二者收缩压检测结果比较,差异无统计学意义(P=0.083)。结论用电子血压计测量血压,其测量结果基本上是准确可信的,建议与水银柱血压计交替配合使用,以避免误差,提高测量结果可靠性。Objective To explore whether there are differences between the measurement results of mercury sphygmomanometer and ann type electronic sphygmomanometer. Methods A total of 52 cases of research objects were selected. The blood pressures of all cases were determined by both mercury sphygmomanometer and arm type electronic sphygmomanometer. The measurement results of two methods were analyzed by paired t-test. Results The differential value between mercury sphygmomanometer and arm type electronic sphygmomanometer was accorded with the product quality standard. The measurement results of systolic pressure of two methods had no statistical difference (P = 0.083). Conclusions The measurement result of blood pressure of arm type electronic sphygmomanometer is substantially accurate and reliable. Mercury sphygmomanometer and arm type electronic sphygmomanometer should be used alternately and cooperatively, so as to avoid the error and improve the reliability of measurement results.
分 类 号:R197.39[医药卫生—卫生事业管理]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145