机构地区:[1]佳木斯大学基础医学院免疫教研室,154007 [2]佳木斯大学基础医学院解剖教研室,154007 [3]佳木斯大学附属第一医院泌尿外科,154007 [4]佳木斯大学基础医学院生化教研室,154007 [5]佳木斯大学人文学院现当代文学教研室,154007
出 处:《中华医学教育探索杂志》2016年第9期925-929,共5页Chinese Journal of Medical Education Research
基 金:黑龙江省高等学校教改工程项目(JG2014011131);佳木斯大学教学研究重点项目(JYYA2013-05、2016JY1028);佳木斯大学百门课程改革工程项目.
摘 要:目的:为了提高免疫学理论教学效果,改善课堂环境,创新课堂教学模式。方法以2012级(对照组60人)和2013级(实验组69人)口腔专业学生作为研究对象,对照组采用传统讲授式教学,实验组采用基于翻转课堂的混合式教学。通过对比分析两组期末考试成绩和问卷调查结果,比较教学效果的差异。应用SPSS 16.0软件进行统计分析,实验结果用率和(x±s)表示,两样本均数比较采用t检验,等级资料比较采用秩和检验。结果对照组课堂表现成绩得分为(14.78±4.27),实验成绩得分为(14.49±4.49);实验组课内外表现成绩得分为(22.19±7.21),实验成绩得分为(7.12±1.33);两组免疫学期末考试成绩[实验组(49.01±7.28) vs.对照组(46.32±7.44)],实验组优于对照组,表明混合式教学对提高学生学习成绩更具优势。问卷调查显示,翻转课堂教学对提高学生自学能力(68.18%,45人)、分析和解决问题能力(68.18%,45人)、团队协作和沟通能力(56.06%,37人)、对知识的掌握(46.97%,31人)等方面优于传统教学,但喜欢并接受翻转课堂教学的学生仅占30.00%左右。结论基于翻转课堂理念的混合式教学有利于提高学习效果,促进学生能力的培养。Objective To improve the classroom environment and students' learning effect and in-novation of classroom teaching mode. Method We took stomatology students of Grade 2012 (control group, 60 people) and Grade 2013 (experimental group, 69 people) as research subjects, and in the control group, the traditional teaching method was used, while the experimental group was based on the mixed mode of the flipped classroom. By comparison of the result of questionnaire survey and final examination between the experimental group and control group, we made clear the difference between blended classroom teaching and traditional classroom teaching. SPSS 16.0 was used for statistical analysis and the data was made t test and rank sum test, and the result was showed by rate and (x±s). Result The classroom performance of the control group was (14.78±4.27), and the experimental result was (14.49±4.49), in the experimental group, the internal and external performance of the experimental group was (22.19±7.21), the experimental result was (7.12±1.33). By comparison of the result of examination between the experimental group (49.01±7.28) and control group (46.32 ±7.44), medical immunology test scores were significantly different (P〈0.05), and the experimental group was better than the control group. It showed that the mixed teaching model had more advantages in improving the academic performance. The results of questionnaire survey showed that flipped classroom teaching was better than traditional classroom teaching in ability training which included self learning ability (68.18%, 45 people), analysis and problem solving skills (68.18%, 45 people), team work and communication skills (56.06%, 37 people), ability of retain knowledge (46.97%, 31 people), however students who liked and accepted this new teaching model only accounted for about 30.00%. Conclusion Inte-gration of flipped classroom mode with traditional mode will enhance the students' learning efficiency and
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...