检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李新民
机构地区:[1]陕西省商洛市丹凤县中医院检验科,陕西商洛726200
出 处:《临床医学研究与实践》2016年第22期103-103,105,共2页Clinical Research and Practice
摘 要:目的对比分析TRFIA法和ELISA法在乙肝五项指标检测中的价值。方法采用回顾性研究方法,选取2015年2月至2015年12月我院收治的乙肝患者125例,选择血清标本后均进行TRFIA法和ELISA法检测分析。结果在125例患者中,ELISA法检测HBs Ag阳性118例,阳性率为94.4%;TRFIA法检测HBs Ag阳性124例,阳性率为99.2%,TRFIA法检测的阳性率高于ELISA法(P<0.05)。结论相对于ELISA法,TRFIA法在乙肝五项指标检测中的应用检出率高,有很好的应用价值。Objective To compare the value of TRFIA and ELISA methods in detection of hepatitis B five indicators. Methods From February 2015 to December 2015, 125 patients who had hepatitis B in our hospital were selected. After selecting serum samples, the patients received TRFIA and ELISA detection analysis. Results Of 125 patients, ELISA detected 118 cases with HBsAg positive (94.4%); TRFIA method detected 124 cases with HBsAg positive (99.2%). The detection rate of HBsAg positive by TRFIA was significantly higher than that of ELISA (P〈0.05). Conclusion Compared with ELISA method, TRFIA method in the application of the five indicators detection can improve the detection rate of hepatitis B.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.70.76