检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李然[1] 田代贵[2] Li Ran Tian Daigui
机构地区:[1]重庆社会科学院农村发展研究所,重庆400020 [2]重庆社会科学院区域发展研究所,重庆400020
出 处:《改革》2016年第9期107-114,共8页Reform
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目"基于新型农户视角的农业用水合作与水价制度设计研究"(批准号:15XJY015)
摘 要:水价改革是提高农业用水效率、增强农民节水意识、改善灌溉工程运行质量的重要举措。农村税费改革以来,农业水价改革陷入"两难"境地:一方面,若维持现有水价,则因水价水平低于供水成本而导致农田水利设施管养经费严重不足,工程难以正常运行,更难以约束农民的用水行为;另一方面,若提高水价,则导致农民负担加重、农业减产。因此,有必要从农业水价改革的历史背景、价格形成机制、实践效果、路径选择与优化四个维度对相关文献进行梳理以揭示问题的症结。结果表明,现有研究需在研究对象拓展、理论框架构建、研究方法和视角完善等三个方面加以突破。Water price reform is an important measure to increase their awareness of water conservation, improve the taxes and fees, agricultural water price reform trapped in a improve the efficiency of agricultural water use, and quality of irrigation projects. Since the reform of rural "dilemma" situation. On the one hand, if the existing water price is maintained, it will result in a serious shortage of custody funds, irrigation project operating abnormally, and restraining farmer's wateruse behavior hardly since the water price level is lower than the water supply cost. On the other hand, if the existing water price is improved, it will result in heavier burden on farmers and reducing agricultural production. Therefore, it is necessary to reveal the crux of the problem from the four dimensions of the historical background, the formation mechanism of agricultural water price, practical effects and route selection and optimization by carding the relevant literature. The results showed that the existing research need to breakthrough in three aspects, such as the extension of the research object, the construction of the theoretical framework, the research methods and the improvement of the oersoective.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.42