内地与港澳青年组织运行机制比较研究  

A Comparative Study on the Operational Mechanism of Mainland,Hong Kong and Macao Youth Organizations

作　　者：李春丽 李龙[2] 谭洪文[3,4] 阮楚山 Li Chunli Li Long Tang Hongwen Ruan Chushan

机构地区：[1]广州市团校 [2]暨南大学新闻与传播学院 [3]广东青年职业学院(广东省团校) [4]广东青年职业学院(广东省团校)团干部培训部 [5]广州市团校团属培训部 [6]广州市青年研究会

出　　处：《青年学报》2016年第4期35-39,共5页Youth Research

基　　金：2015年度广州共青团与青少年工作研究课题“内地与港澳青年组织运行机制比较研究”(课题编号:2015003)

摘　　要：青年组织在社会和政治生活中的表现不同,与其组织运行机制不同密切相关。为促进内地青年组织的培育与发展,加强对港澳青年组织的认识与引导,本课题组开展了内地青年组织与港澳青年组织运行机制的比较研究,研究发现:在社会动员机制方面,二者都尤其注重网络平台的使用,不过港澳青年组织借宗教力量进行社会动员的痕迹颇深;在资源筹集机制方面,二者均会因组织背景不同而有所不同,不过由于法律的健全,港澳地区的青年组织基本上都能得到地区法律的支持与保护,其青年组织的生存压力相对少一些;在思想引领机制方面,二者均有意识形态上的教化功能,也有相对自由和多元化的内容与形式,但是港澳青年组织受西方政治文化的影响明显,相对内地而言更能独立自主地开展活动。The different performances of youth organizations in social and political life are closely related to their operating mechanisms. In order to enhance the development of youth organizations and raise the awareness of Hong Kong and Macao youth organizations, the Group has carried out a comparative research on the operating mechanism among China's Mainland, Hong Kong and Macao youth organizations. In terms of the promotion mechanism, all choose networks as their socializing tools, but Hong Kong and Macao youth organizations rely heavily on religious groups due to historic reasons. In resource mobilization, they differ from each other due to their organizational backgrounds. However, the sound legislation system guarantees the youth organizations in Hong Kong and Macao an access to legal support and protection and less life pressure. When it comes to the social value, the youth groups in these two places are much more open and influenced by different cultures. It is the western political culture that inspires the local youth groups to hold activities without the outside influence.

关 键 词：青年组织 组织运行 社会动员机制 资源筹集机制 思想引领机制 

分 类 号：C916[经济管理]