检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南昌大学法学院,江西南昌330031 [2]中共江西省委党校法学教研部,江西南昌330003
出 处:《南昌大学学报(人文社会科学版)》2016年第5期112-117,共6页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)
基 金:江西省社会科学"十二五"规划项目"定罪中的人格问题研究"(13FX05)
摘 要:人格责任论将责任的基础归咎于行为者的人格,又认为行为人实施了体现主体人格的个别行为时就存在责任。这种人格定罪模式对于解释违法性意识可能性、忘却犯及期待可能性等刑法问题具有理论价值。人格责任论既将人格引入定罪,又格守罪刑法定原则,避免侵害个人自由;但存在对人格与行为的关系认识不全面,没有真正将人格引入定罪之中,立足点仍然是报应而不是预防。It is considered that the foundation of responsibility depends on personality of the actor to responsibility of personality. It is believed that responsibility will be existed when the actor has carried out individual act being embodied subjective personality. This conviction pattern of personality has theoretical value to interpret some problems of criminal law such as probability of irregularity awareness,forgetting crime and expecting probality. Responsibility of personality not only leads personality to conviction,but also scrupulously abides by the principle of legality and refrains from personal freedom. However,this theory has some problems such as incomplete acquaintance to relationship of personality and behaviour,not authentically leading personality to conviction and basing on retribution instead of prevention.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.240.165