机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属仁济医院肾脏科,200127
出 处:《中华肾脏病杂志》2016年第10期721-727,共7页Chinese Journal of Nephrology
基 金:国家重点基础研究发展计划(973计划)(2012CB517602);国家自然科学基金(81570604);“十二五”国家科技支撑计划(2011BAI10B08)
摘 要:目的比较来氟米特联合中小剂量激素与足量激素治疗IgA肾病的短期与长期疗效及安全性评估。方法研究人群18~65周岁,纳入标准eGFR≥30ml·min-1·(1.73m2)-1且24h尿蛋白量〉0.5g的原发性IgA肾病患者。所有人选患者经计算机随机进入来氟米特联合中小剂量激素组(LEF组)和单用激素组(激素组);研究的主要终点为:(1)进入ESRD或透析治疗;(2)Ser升高超过基线值的50%;次要终点为蛋白尿缓解。结果完成随访的患者共90例,LEF组40例,激素组50例,基线24h尿蛋白量LEF组和激素组分别为2.00(1.10,2.88)g和1.87(1.13,3.08)g,两组患者尿蛋白在治疗6个月[分别为0.30(0.11,0.93)g,0.30(0.14,1.33)g]和12个月[分别为0.30(0.09,0.82)g,0.32(0.14,0.66)朗时较治疗前均有好转(P〈0.05)。激素组治疗后eGFR较治疗前升高[治疗前(80.39±28.56)、6个月(87.12±28.70)、12个月(88.20±30.26)ml·min-1·(1.73m2)-1,P〈0.05],LEF组eGFR治疗前后差异无统计学意义[治疗前(87.63±27.35)、6个月(86.91±32.45)、12个月(90.06±30.00)ml·min-1·(1.73m2)-1,P〉0.05],但治疗6个月及12个月时两组间比较尿蛋白、血肌酐、eGFR差异均无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。治疗期间两组不良反应发生率(LEF组9/40例,激素组11/50例)差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。平均随访79个月发现两组肾脏预后差异无统计学意义。Cox回归分析提示基线血肌酐及肾脏间质炎性细胞浸润程度是IgA肾病疾病进展的独立危险因素。结论来氟米特联合中小剂量激素对进展性IgA肾病的疗效与足量激素相当,治疗期间未增加不良事件发生率。Objective To compare the efficacy and safety of leflunomide (LEF) combined with medium/low dose eorticosteroids and full dose of corticosteroids in the treatment of IgA nephropathy. Method Primary IgAN patients diagnosed by renal biopsy with 18-65 years old and eGFR ≥30 ml· min-1·(1.73 m2)-1 and proteinuria 〉 0.5 g/24 h were enrolled in a prospective controlled clinical study. They were randomly divided into leflunomide combined with medium/low dose corticosteroids (LEF group) and corticosteroids alone (steroid group). The primary outcomes were (1) end stage renal disease or dialysis (2) 50% increase in serum creatinine above the baseline. Secondary outcome was the remission of proteinuria. Results Ninety patients completed the follow-up. The 24- hour proteinuria at baseline were 2.00(1.10, 2.88) g and 1.87(1.13,3.08) g in LEF group and steroid group respectively. Compared with baseline, it was significantly decreased in both groups at 6 months [0.30(0.11, 0.93) g, 0.30(0.14, 1.33) g] and 12 months [0.30(0.09, 0.82) g, 0.32(0.14, 0.66) g], (P〈 0.05). Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) at baseline, 6 months and 12 months were (80.39± 28.56), (87.12±28.70) and (88.20±30.26) ml· min-1· (1.73 m2)-1. It was decreased in steroid group (P 〈 0.05), while no significant difference was detected in LEF group[baseline (87.63 ±27.35), 6 months (86.91±32.45), 12 months (90.06±30.00) ml· min-1· (1.73 m2)-1, P 〉 0.05]. At 6 and 12 months, there was no significant difference in terms of 24- hour proteinuria, serum creatinine and eGFR (CKD-EPI) between groups (P 〉 0.05). There was no statistically significant difference in adverse events between groups during the treatment (9/40 eases in LEF group and 11/50 eases in steroid group, P 〉 0.05). The average follow-up was 79 months, and there was no difference in the renal prognosis between the two groups. Multivariate Cox regression analysis reveal
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...