检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:俞建阳[1] 王若玉[1] 陈浮[1] 宋彦萍[1]
机构地区:[1]哈尔滨工业大学能源科学与工程学院,哈尔滨150001
出 处:《工程热物理学报》2016年第11期2311-2318,共8页Journal of Engineering Thermophysics
基 金:国家自然科学基金委创新研究群体基金(No.51121004);国家自然科学基金(No.50976026)
摘 要:本文基于大涡模拟方法,对比讨论了四种不同亚格子模型的计算原理和仿真特性,并对等离子体激励下的凸包流场进行了研究,结果表明:WALE模型和KET模型的仿真结果比较准确;Smagorinsky-Lilly模型耗散偏大且模型系数不具普适性,仿真准确性较差;WMLES模型存在严重的过度耗散,各流动参数的仿真结果误差很大,无法准确捕捉流动转捩的发生;等离子体激励通过向附面层流体注入能量产生等效的壁面射流,可以显著延缓凸包流动分离并促进流动再附、抑制涡的发生,从而起到降低耗散,湍流减阻的作用。Four different Subgrid-Scale models were employed in the study of flow over a wall-mounted hump and then the most capable one was used in flow control with the DBD plasma in this work. The results show that the WALE model and the KET model demonstrate good qualitative agreement with the experimental data The Smagorinsky-Lilly displays some shortage in the simulation, while more dissipations and the disability in capture the transition in the boundary layer are found in the WMLES model. A wall jet shows up in near wall region when the DBD plasma is applied in the flow. It would lead to the delay of the flow separation the happen of the reattachment in advance and the restraining of the spanwise vorticity Therefore, the DBD plasma actuator has been demonstrated to have the ability in dissipation decrease and turbulent drag reduction.
分 类 号:TV131.2[水利工程—水力学及河流动力学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.66