检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:麦莹
机构地区:[1]广东省佛山市顺德区桂洲医院麻醉科,佛山528305
出 处:《北方药学》2016年第11期182-183,共2页Journal of North Pharmacy
摘 要:目的:比较在小儿咽喉部手术中应用瑞芬太尼与舒芬太尼的麻醉效果。方法:选取我院于2015年2月-2016年2月期间收治的60例行咽喉部手术患儿,根据不同麻醉方法将其平均分成瑞芬太尼组与舒芬太尼组各30例,对比两组患儿的麻醉效果。结果:舒芬太尼组患儿术后的呼吸恢复时间、睁眼时间、拔出气管导管时间均短于瑞芬太尼组,对比差异显著,有统计学意义(P〈0.05);舒芬太尼组患儿术后的不良反应发生率为13.3%,瑞芬太尼组为33.3%,对比差异显著,有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论:在小儿咽喉部手术中应用舒芬太尼麻醉的效果优于应用瑞芬太尼麻醉。Objective: the anesthetic effect of remifentanil and sufentanil in comparison in children throat surgery. Methods: in our hospital in February 2015 to 2016 during February were 60 patients underwent throat surgery in children, according to different methods of anesthesia will be divided into group of remifentanil and sufentanil group, 30 cases in each group, compared two groups of children with anesthetic effect. Results: postoperative sufentanil group with breathing recovery time, eye opening time, pulling out the tracheal catheter time were shorter in the remifentanil group, had significant differences, was statistically significant (P〈0.05); sufentanil group with postoperative adverse reactions occurred rate was 13.3%, remifentanil group was 33.3%, and significant differences, was statistically significant (P〈0.05).Conclusion: remifentanil is better than the effect of sufentanil anesthesia in children throat surgery in anesthesia.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:52.15.123.168