检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马应征[1] MA Ying-zheng(School of Social Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beij ing 100084, China)
出 处:《西北农林科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第6期29-34,共6页Journal of Northwest A&F University(Social Science Edition)
摘 要:流动人口研究是多年以来的学术热点所在,我国学术界中存在着将农民工问题"特例化"的现象。在对相关文献进行述评的基础上,以其他发展中国家的乡城人口迁移作为对比,从四个方面提出我国的农民工现象在世界上并非很特殊:城乡间的循环流动和非完整家庭迁移模式在许多发展中国家普遍存在;我国城市化水平并没有被高估;户籍制度并不是造成农民工现象的根本原因;户籍制度并未使人口流动的推、拉力失效。Research involving migrant population has been flourishing for many years,and some scholars argue that rural-urban migration in China is unique in the world.Based on a critical review of relevant literature and comparison with other developing countries,this paper draws the following conclusions:Migrating with some family members left behind and circular migration between rural home and urban areas also widely exist in other developing countries;China's urbanization level is not over-estimated;The household registration system is not the fundamental cause that results in the weak position of the rural-urban migrants and it doesn't lead to the loss of efficacy of push and pull factors in migration.In short,rural-urban migration in China is not unique.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38