检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖北中医药大学,湖北武汉430061 [2]湖北省中医院,湖北武汉430061
出 处:《针灸临床杂志》2016年第10期58-60,共3页Journal of Clinical Acupuncture and Moxibustion
摘 要:目的:探讨针灸透刺法结合拔罐疗法治疗顽固性面瘫的临床疗效。方法:选取湖北省中医院光谷院区门诊及住院部收治的顽固性面瘫患者62例,将其随机分为透刺组和常规针刺组,每组各31例。透刺组采用透刺法结合拔罐疗法治疗,常规针刺组采用常规针灸治疗。对比两组患者的临床治疗疗效。结果:透刺组总有效率为96.77%,显愈率为87.1%;常规针刺组总有效率为93.55%,显愈率为54.84%;两组治疗4个疗程后总有效率进行比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后Stennert面神经麻痹评分比较有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:透刺结合拔罐疗法治疗顽固性面瘫效果十分显著,具有极大的临床应用及推广价值。Objective:To investigate the therapeutic effect of penetrative needling plus cupping for treating re- fractory facial paralysis. Methods: Sixty - two patients were randomly allocated into two groups. In the treatment group 31 cases received penetrative needling plus cupping and in the control group 31 cases received conven- tional acupuncture. Results:In the treatment group the marked efficacy rate and the total efficacy rate were 87. 1% and 96.77% respectively and they were 54.84% and 93.55% in the control group. There was a statis- tically significant difference between two groups after 4 courses of treatment( P 〈0.05 ). After treatment Sten- nert score of facial nerve paralysis had a significant difference between two groups ( P 〈 0.05 ). Conclusion: The effect of penetrative needling plus cupping is significantly better than that of conventional acupuncture on refrac- tory facial paralysis.
分 类 号:R246.6[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117