检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]长沙矿山研究院有限责任公司,湖南长沙410012 [2]金属矿山安全技术国家重点实验室,湖南长沙410012
出 处:《矿业研究与开发》2016年第10期31-34,共4页Mining Research and Development
摘 要:为了确定矿山合理的采矿方法,综合考虑经济、技术和安全3个方面对采矿方法的影响,利用层次分析法原理建立采矿方法综合评价模型,采用层次分析法和熵值法确定评价指标组合权重,再结合逼近理想解的排序法(TOPSIS)理论确定各方案的优越度,确定最优采矿方法。以赵家湾铜矿采矿方法选择为例,确定各备选方案的综合优越度分别为50.3%、50.7%、60.7%,从而确定方案Ⅲ最优。研究结果表明:该方法运用于采矿方法的选择中是科学的、合理的。In order to determine the reasonable mining meth- od, considering the impact of economy, technology and safety on the mining method, a comprehensive evaluation index system was established by using the principle of hierarchy analytic method, and the evaluation index weight was confirmed by AHP and entropy method. Combined with TOP- SIS theory, the synthetic superior degree of each mining method was determined, and the optimal mining method could be selected. Taking the mining method of Zhao-jiawan Copper Mine for an example, the superior degrees of alternatives were respectively 50.3%, 50.7% and 60.7%, so that the third mining method was optimal. The result showed that the study was scientific and rational in optimization of mining methods.
关 键 词:熵值法 层次分析法 组合赋权 逼近理想解的排序法 采矿方法
分 类 号:TD853[矿业工程—金属矿开采]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15