检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:袁超凡[1] 时惠平[1] 邹志康[1] 陈肇一[1] 郑军[1]
出 处:《军事医学》2016年第10期787-789,共3页Military Medical Sciences
摘 要:目的通过分析我军飞行人员腰椎峡部裂的医学鉴定情况,与美军标准比较异同以促进我军选拔工作。方法对2013~2015年在空军总医院空勤科进行医学鉴定的结果进行统计,将腰椎峡部裂的具体情况按中美标准进行对比,分析其异同及可能的原因。结果我军飞行人员医学鉴定合格率约为85%,实际鉴定情况与美军标准相似,两军飞行合格率差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论我军在腰椎峡部裂这一病种的飞行人员医学鉴定标准方面与美军相似,说明在招飞选拔相关标准中可进行适当改进。Objective To improve the selection of flying cadets of the Air Force of People's Liberation Army of China( PLAAF) by analyzing the differences of medical identification of lumbar spondylolysis between PLAAF and the US Air Force( USAF). Methods Flight crew who had been checked for lumbar spondylolysis during hospitalization at the Air Force General Hospital between 2013 and 2015 were chosen. The results of their medical identification were compaired according to PLAAF and USAF Medical Standards Directory,and their differences and possible reasons were analyzed accordingly. Results The qualified rate of PLAAF was about 85%,which was very close to the standards of USAF,but the difference was not of any statistical significance( P 0. 05). Conclusion The standards of our medical identification of lumbar spondylolysis was similar to those of USAF,suggesting that the selection of flying cadets can be improved.
分 类 号:R851.3[医药卫生—航空、航天与航海医学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112