检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]贵阳护理职业学院,贵州贵阳550018 [2]贵阳市第六人民医院
出 处:《中国地方病防治》2016年第8期872-872,874,共2页Chinese Journal of Control of Endemic Diseases
基 金:贵州省卫计委科学研究基金项目(基金编号:gzwjkj2014-1-019)
摘 要:目的探讨社区护理干预对于糖尿病治疗依从性的影响。方法选择本院接诊的社区糖尿病患者120例,纳入对象有完整临床资料,签署知情同意书愿意配合本次研究,按照随机数字法分为对照组和研究组,每组60例。对照组以常规护理处理,研究组加用社区护理干预,比较两组患者治疗依从性、血糖控制率及护理前后空腹血糖(FBG)、餐后2 h血糖(P2h BG)、糖化血红蛋白(HbAlc)。结果研究组治疗依从率、血糖控制率显著高于对照组;护理干预后研究组FBG、P2h BG、HbAlc显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论糖尿病治疗依从性应用社区护理干预不仅可以提高治疗依从率,同时可以改善疗效。A total of 120 diabetics cases were selected, who owned complete clinical data and were willing to cooperate in this research. According to the random number method the cases were divided into control and research groups equally. The control group treated with conventional care, research group with community nursing intervention, treatment compliance, glucose control rate, fasting blood glucose (FBG} before and after nursing, postprandial 2h blood glucose (P2hBG) and glycated hemoglobin ( HbAlc ) were compared. Results Treatment compliance rate and blood sugar control rates of research group were significantly higher than that of control group; FBG, P2hBG and HbAlc of research group was significantly lower than that of control group ( P〈0.05 ) after nursing. Conclusion Community nursing intervention can not only improve the compliance, but improve the treatment efficacy.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15