科学与宗教的类比何以可能?——评布鲁尔对强纲领的论证  

How could the Analogy between Science and Religion be Possible?——An Analysis of Bloor's Argument for Strong Programme

作　　者：雷环捷 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学哲学院,北京100872

出　　处：《自然辩证法研究》2016年第11期71-75,81,共6页Studies in Dialectics of Nature

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目"现代社会技术化问题研究"(16AZX007)

摘　　要：布鲁尔为捍卫强纲领而进行科学与宗教的类比论证。类比的第一阶段是对科学的涂尔干式探讨,效仿宗教将科学知识归为意识形态以解构其神圣性。第二阶段则援引图宾根教会史学学派的经验,并驳斥劳丹的科学思想史说明模式。面对论证引发的质疑,不仅需要尝试性回应,更应分析论证的内在逻辑。总体而言,布鲁尔的论证完整性有余而完善性不足。Bloor used the analogy between science and religion to argue for strong programme. The first stage of the analogy is a Durkheimean approach toscience. He attributed the scientific knowledge to ideology and deconstructed its sacredness as the same as religion. In the second stage of the analogy, hecited the experience of the Tttbingen school of church historiography and refuted Laudang model of scientific progress. Facing the challenges which werecaused by the argument, it needs to be tentatively responded and especially analyzed the internal logic of the analogy. In general, Bloor＇ s argument is fullof completeness but lack of perfectness.

关 键 词：意识形态 科学 宗教 布鲁尔 强纲领 类比 

分 类 号：N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]