论我国侵权行为地认定规则的空白与补位——兼评《涉外民事关系法律适用法》第44条  

On the Absence and Supplement of Determination Rules of Locus Delicti in China——Criticism on Article 44 of the Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relations of PRC

作　　者：文媛怡 WEN Yuan-yi(Faculty of International Law, China University of Political Science and Law,Peking, 100088 ,China)

机构地区：[1]中国政法大学国际法学院,北京100088

出　　处：《大庆师范学院学报》2016年第5期38-42,共5页Journal of Daqing Normal University

基　　金：国家社科基金项目"<涉外民事关系法律适用法>实施研究"(14AFX026)

摘　　要：我国现行的《法律适用法》第44条确立了涉外侵权之债适用侵权行为地法的基本规则,却并未对"侵权行为地"做出清晰界定,导致法官自由裁量权空间过大,法律适用结果的可预见性和确定性目标受损,这是该法的现存缺陷之一。在补充相关规则的过程中,不仅要立足于我国的现实环境,也要对西方国家在侵权行为地认定方面运用的最后事件理论、最密切联系原则等方法给予关注。可行途径是经由最高人民法院以司法解释的形式对侵权行为地认定进行细化指导,确立侵权行为实施地为基础,更密切联系原则为补充的侵权行为地认定标准。Article 44 of Law of the Application of Law for Foreign-related Civil Relations of the People＇s Republic of China set up a basic principle that the law applicable to foreign-related tort is the lex loci delicti.However,there is no definition of locus delicti. It is one of the defects of the Law and leads to uncertainty of the legal practice. When we improve the law,we need to face the realities of our country. And,it is necessary to pay attention to the advanced foreign theories,such as Last Event Doctrine and principle of closest relationship.One of the possible ways is to clarify the definition of locus delicti along with a judicial interpretation of the People＇s Supreme Court. And the locus delicti should be interpreted as the place where the tortious act was conducted,and a escape clause based on the principle of closest relationship is also needed.

关 键 词：侵权冲突法 侵权行为地 认定规则 《法律适用法》第44条 

分 类 号：D997.1[政治法律—国际法学]