应用椎间盘镜与椎板开窗行单节段髓核摘除术的疗效分析  

The Effect of MED and FD in the Treatment of Single Segment Nucleus Pulposus Removal

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:伊力夏提·赛吾来提 帕力哈提·白克吐尔逊 YI Lixiati SAI Wulaiti PAR Hat BAI Ketuerxun(Department of second orthopeadic , Yili friendship hospital, Yili, Xingjiang, 83000)

机构地区:[1]伊犁州友谊医院骨外二科,新疆伊犁835000

出  处:《中国伤残医学》2016年第17期2-4,共3页Chinese Journal of Trauma and Disability Medicine

摘  要:目的:比较应用椎间盘镜( Microendoscopic Discectomy , MED)与椎板开窗( Fanestration Discectomy , FD)髓核摘除术在治疗单节段腰椎间盘突出症( Lumbar Disc Herniation , LDH)的临床疗效。方法:回顾性分析2011年6月~2013年6月,我院97例单节段性LDH患者行髓核摘除手术的患者为研究对象,其中行MED65例,FD32例,获得如年龄、性别、术中出血量、手术时间等信息,并随访分析。结果:MED组术中出血量较FD组少,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),FD组手术时间较MED组较短,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。术中相关并发症(硬膜囊破裂、神经根损伤)比较,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。随访时间6个月~4年,17例失访,失访率为17.89%。随访不同阶段,MED术后并发症发生率明显低于FD组,差异有统计学意义( P<0.05),术后JOA优良率术后1周和术后6周,MED组要高于FD组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。但在术后6个月JOA优良率及随访终末期术后复发率的比较中,2组差异不显著( P>0.05)。结论:MED可以有效缓解单阶段LDH症状,术后并发症发生率较FD低,值得临床参考应用。Obj ective:To compare the clinical effect of MED( Microendoscopic Discectomy ) and FD( Fanestration Discectomy) nucle-us pulposus removal in the treatment of single segment LDH .Methods:Retrospective analysis from June 2011 to June 2013, 97 patients with single segmental LDH in our hospital ,who underwent nucleus pulposus removal were the study object , there were 65 cases in MED group and 32 cases in FD group, Information such as age, sex, blood loss, operation time and so on were collected and analyzed .Re-sults:The amount of bleeding in MED group was less than that of FD group , and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05), and the operation time of FD group was shorter than that of MED group , and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05).The intraoperative related complications ( dural capsule rupture , nerve root damage ) were compared , and there were no significant differences ( P〉0.05).The follow-up period was 6 months -4 years, 17 cases were lost, the rate of loss was 17.89%.Different stages of follow-up, Med postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in FD group , differences were statistically significant (P 〈0.05). Postoperative JOA excellent operation rate after operation and 1 week after 6 weeks, the Med group to group was higher than that of FD , the difference is statistically significant (P 〈0.05).However, in the 6 months after surgery, the excellent and follow -up of JOA and the recurrence rate after the end of the surgery , the difference between the two groups was not significant (P〉0.05).Conclusion:MED can effectively relieve the symptoms of single stage LDH , and the incidence of postoperative complication is lower than that of FD , which is worthy of clinical reference .

关 键 词:椎间盘镜 椎板开窗 腰椎间盘突出症 

分 类 号:R681.5[医药卫生—骨科学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象