检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邵军[1] 陈洁[1] 鲁国建[1] 徐宏伟[1] 邱勇刚[1] 陈文娟[1] 杨国芳[1] 贾文庆[1] 傅佳峰[1] 廖锋[1] 毛雪军[1]
出 处:《浙江创伤外科》2016年第5期819-822,共4页Zhejiang Journal of Traumatic Surgery
基 金:浙江省医学会课题(自制导航板在外科治疗脑溢血中的应用价值)
摘 要:目的评价简易导航板在外科手术治疗高血压脑出血的应用价值。方法 64例高血压脑出血患者随机分成两组:常规CT片定位手术组(常规组,n=33),简易导航版定位手术导组(导航组,n=31)。对两组手术切口长度、手术时间、血肿清除率、术后再出血、住院时间、术后1周GCS评分及术后6个月GOS评分等进行统计学分析。结果统计学分析显示在手术切口长度、手术时间、血肿清除率、住院时间、1周GCS评分等方面,导航组明显优于常规组(P<0.05)。结论简易导航板在外科手术治疗高血压性脑出血简单实用。Objective To evaluate the application of the simple navigation device in surgical treatment of hypertensive intracerebral hemorrhage. Methods Sixty-four hypertensive intraeerebral hemorrhage patients were randomly divided into two groups: conventional surgical treatment group (n=33), navigation surgical treatment group (n=31). The incision length, operative time, hematoma clearance rat, postoperative bleeding, length of hospital stay, postoperative 1 week Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) and 6 months Glasgow Outcome Scale (GOS) were analyzed statistically. Results Statistical analysis showed navigation surgical treatment group were better than the conventional surgical treatment group in the incision length, operative time, hematoma clearance rate, length of hospital stay, postoperative bleeding, 1 week GCS score. Conclusion Simple navigation device is simple and practical in the surgical treatment of hypertensive intraeerebral hemorrhage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.223.239.228