检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李毅婷[1]
机构地区:[1]闽南师范大学闽南文化研究中心,福建漳州363000
出 处:《闽台文化研究》2016年第3期58-63,共6页Fujian-Taiwan Cultural Research
摘 要:通过排比《鹿洲公案》所载案例,可以发现蓝鼎元的司法实践并非以"德主刑辅"为特征,而是与其"以杀止杀"的明刑弼教主张相一致。在民事诉讼上,他并不注重两造争讼的法律事实,为使百姓体会到人伦的可贵,他不惜以强权调解,曲法断案;在刑事案件上,他常竭力审明事件始末真相,让罪犯得到应有的惩罚;饥荒、牵连过广则是其宽宥罪犯的主要原因。The analysis of the cases in Intricate Case of Lu Zhou by classification and comparison shows the judicial practice of Lan Dingyuan was not "moral dominant, punishment assistant". As far as he was concerned, he held that answering violence with violence would help to educate people. In civil litigation, he often resorted to power for mediation and twisted the law, paying little attention to fait juridique. In the processing of criminal case, he brought the criminal to justice after finding out the truth of the case. Also, he would pardon criminals mainly due to famine or involvement of many in the case.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145