检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:兰贞波 刘飞[1] 刘波[1] 冯万兴[1] 张杰[1] 周盛[1]
机构地区:[1]国网电力科学研究院武汉南瑞有限责任公司,湖北武汉430074
出 处:《广东电力》2016年第10期7-11,23,共6页Guangdong Electric Power
基 金:国家电网公司科技指南项目(SGTYHT/14-JS-188)
摘 要:根据未来电动汽车救援需求,介绍3种不同类型电动汽车救援车——传统能源救援车、储能电池系统救援车以及结合传统能源和储能电池系统于一体的救援车,说明3种救援车的主要区别在于救援车自身动力类型和救援时的充电救援方式。依据汽车的生产、运维和报废过程产生的费用对救援车进行全寿命周期成本分析对比,得出3种救援车全寿命周期成本费用,结果表明,传统能源和储能电池系统于一体的救援车全寿命周期成本费用最低,相比其他两类车型经济性最好,可广泛推广使用。According to future electric vehicle rescue demands, this paper introduces three different types of rescue vehicles for electric vehicles including traditional energy rescue vehicles, storage battery system rescue vehicles and integrated rescue vehicles combining traditional energy and storage battery system. It explains major differences of these three kinds of rescue vehicles are self power types and charging rescue modes. In terms of production cost, operation and maintenance cost and cost produced in the process of rejection, it analyzes life cycle cost of the rescue vehicle and obtains costs of three kinds of vehicles. Results indicate life cycle cost of the integrated rescue vehicle combining traditional energy and storage battery system is the lowest and this kind of rescue vehicle has the best economy compared with the other two kinds of vehicles, which can be widely popularized and applied.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.74