检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:高婧[1,2] 周莉[1] 石娟[3] 洪洁[3] 陈慧[1] 陈晨[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院妇产科,上海200025 [2]上海交通大学医学院附属国际和平妇幼保健院妇产科 [3]上海交通大学医学院附属瑞金医院内分泌科,上海200025
出 处:《诊断学理论与实践》2016年第4期415-420,共6页Journal of Diagnostics Concepts & Practice
基 金:上海市浦江人才计划(11PJ1406600)
摘 要:目的:在不同体质量指数(body mass index,BMI)的多囊卵巢综合征(polycystic ovary syndrome,PCOS)患者中,探讨评估胰岛素抵抗(insulin resistance,IR)的新方法。方法:纳入符合鹿特丹标准、糖耐量正常的PCOS患者186例和健康对照者84例,比较PCOS患者中非肥胖组和肥胖组的临床特征,计算口服葡萄糖耐量试验(oral glucose tolerance test,OGTT)和胰岛素释放试验(insulin release test,IRT)各个时相HOMA-My值,应用受试者工作特征(receiver operating characteristic,ROC)曲线来评价各HOMA-My值对不同BMI的PCOS患者IR的预测价值。结果:PCOS非肥胖亚组与肥胖亚组间的性激素结合球蛋白(sex hormone binding globulin,SHBG)及17-羟孕酮(17-hydroxyprogesterone,17-OHP)水平存在显著差异(P<0.05)。对于评价非肥胖PCOS患者的IR,HOMA-M30最有价值(临界值为27.50,曲线下面积为0.753),HOMA-IR诊断能力最差;而对于肥胖PCOS患者,HOMA-M60是最佳指标(临界值为32.17,曲线下面积为0.883),HOMA-IR稍次于它。结论 :本研究提供一种新的评估IR的方法 ,HOMA-IR在诊断非肥胖PCOS患者IR的准确性很低,应在结合其他HOMA-My值的基础上重点观察HOMA-M30。HOMA-IR在肥胖的PCOS患者中仍然推荐使用,本研究建议临界值为2.67。Objective: To investigate a new criteria for evaluating insulin resistance (IR) in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) patients with different body mass index (BMI). Methods: A total of 186 PCOS patients diagnosed according to Rotterdam criterion with normal glucose tolerance were enrolled, and 84 healthy volunteers were served as controls. Clini- cal features were compared between normal-weight and obese patients (BMI〈25 kg/m2 and BMI≥25 kg/m2). Oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and insulin release test (IRT) were performed in all subjects, and HOMA-My value of IRT on diffe- rent time point were calculated. Predictivity of HOMA-My for IR in PCOS patients with different BMI was assessed by re- ceiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results: The levels of sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) and 17-hydro- xyprogesterone (17-OHP) were significantly different between normal-weight and obese subgroup. HOMA-M30 was an opti- mal parameter (cutoff value: 27.50, AUC: 0.753) for assessing IR in normal-weight patients, while HOMA-IR was the worst. For obese PCOS, predictivity of HOMA-M60 was the best (cutoff value: 32.17, AUC: 0.883), and HOMA-IR (cutoff value: 2.67) was slightly less (cutoff value 2.67, AUC: 87.6%). Conclusions: A new criteria is developed for evaluating IR in PCOS group. HOMA-IR is not a proper index for evaluating IR in normal-weight PCOS patients, but is still recom- mended to be used as a criteria with a cutoff value of 2.67 in obese patients. For normal-weight PCOS patients, HOMA- M30 combined with HOMA-My should be used.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.229