检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]南方医科大学珠江医院肝胆一科,广东广州510282 [2]广州中医药大学附属第二医学院检验科,广东广州510120 [3]河南省西平县第二人民医院普外科,河南西平463900
出 处:《中国医药导报》2016年第31期153-157,共5页China Medical Herald
基 金:国家高技术研究发展(863)计划(2012AA021105);国家自然科学基金资助项目(U1401254);广东省科技计划项目(2012A080203013)
摘 要:目的探究护理干预对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者护理满意度影响的系统评价。方法全面收集2008年1月~2016年8月公开发表的护理干预对腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者护理满意度影响的随机对照试验,评价纳入论文的研究质量,提取资料,采用Revman 5.3软件分析。结果共纳入19项随机对照试验,Meta分析结果显示,术前0.5 h SAS,SDS量表的评分比较,差异有统计学意义。森林图显示,与对照组相比,护理干预组患者护理满意度提高[OR=3.59,95%CI(3.43,5.29)],漏斗图显示分布对称性稍差,纳入研究存在发表偏倚。结论护理干预可显著降低腹腔镜胆囊切除术患者的术前焦虑,提高护理满意度,具有一定的积极影响,可以推广应用。Objective To explore the nursing intervention in patients with laparoscopic cholecystectomy nursing satisfaction evaluation system. Methods All randomized controlled trials, on record, about nursing intervention impacts on patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for gallbladder excision that published on line from January 2008 to August 2016 were involved in this study. Revman 5.3 software was used to analyze and assesses the quality of involved articles and extracted data. Results 19 randomized controlled trials were included. The results of Meta-analysis showed that there was a significant statistical difference between SAS and SDS scales with half an hour before the operation.The forest plot showed that the care satisfactions were improved in nursing intervention group when compared with the control group [OR=3.59, 95% CI(3.43,5.29).The funnel plot revealed that distribution of symmetry was slightly inferior and biases were existed. Conclusion Nursing intervention can remarkably reduce anxiety preoperatively and improve the degree of nursing satisfaction with patients underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy. It has a positive impact and can be popularized application.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28