检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张杨波[1]
出 处:《兰州大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第5期13-22,共10页Journal of Lanzhou University(Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(11CSH052);国家社会科学基金项目(12CZZ048)
摘 要:关于中国社会抗争的研究文献都隐含了抗争策略合法性这个重要前提,认为重新揭示合法性在抗争研究中的地位将对未来的类似研究有重大启发。以东湖村的小产权房外来户的社会抗争为例,从合法性概念入手,全面还原了无法维权的社会抗争实现的可能进路。研究发现,外来户在法律及情理不予支持的条件下,通过瓦解对方和建构自我合法性的双重策略,使一场看似没有合法依据的社会抗争取得了生存空间。Legitimacy of protest strategies is observed as an important premise in almost all research literature about China's social protest. This paper argues that re-weighing the status of legitimacy in the research about social protest is significant. Taking as an example the social protest of an immigrant who owned a house with limited property right in Donghu village of Wuhan and starting from the concept of legitimacy,this paper has fully restored the possibility of social protest fulfillment void of legal protection. Studies show that through disintegrating the other party and constructing his own legality, this immigrant succeeded in winning an opportunity for his social protest without the support of law and rationality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15