也论虚假诉讼的刑法规制——兼析《刑法修正案(九)》第三十五条  

On Criminal Regulations against Fraud Litigation in Light of Criminal Law—Together with the Analysis of the 35th Article of Criminal Law Amendment(9)

作　　者：武晓红[1] 武少安 

机构地区：[1]甘肃政法学院法学院,甘肃兰州730070

出　　处：《兰州大学学报（社会科学版）》2016年第5期176-183,共8页Journal of Lanzhou University（Social Sciences）

基　　金：甘肃省高等学校科研项目(2015A-116)

摘　　要：虚假诉讼在当前的蔓延发展已经对正常的司法秩序造成了严重的破坏,损害了司法公正和司法权威。2012年新修订的《民事诉讼法》虽对某些虚假诉讼行为设置了法律责任,但仍未有效遏制虚假诉讼的发展。司法实务界和理论界对虚假诉讼入罪的呼声愈发高涨。目前《刑法修正案(九)》已将虚假诉讼纳入立法中。本文在刑法谦抑性视角下,通过厘清和分析虚假诉讼的概念、入罪的学说,兼析《刑法修正案(九)》第三十五条,对虚假诉讼的刑法规制提出具体的制度设计,以期为立法修改、具体司法解释提供参考。The spread of fraud litigation has caused severe damage to the normal judicial order, harming the judicial justice and authority. In 2012, although the newly revised Law of Civil Procedure set up legal liabilities for fraud litigation, no effective development has ever been made. In judicial practice and theoretical circles, the cry for criminal regulations against fraud litigation has been increasingly heard. At present, Criminal Law Amendment（9） has added false litigation in legislation. By considering the restraining criminal law and clarifying the concepts of fraud litigation and crime conviction, this paper puts forward concrete and systematic designs for criminal regulations against fraud litigation in order to provide references for legislative amendments and specific judicial interpretations.

关 键 词：虚假诉讼 谦抑性 刑法规制 虚假诉讼罪 

分 类 号：D035.5[政治法律—政治学]