检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:瞿伟[1] 马红燕 谷珊珊[1] 朱才众[3] 宫海燕[4]
机构地区:[1]第三军医大学西南医院临床心理科,重庆400038 [2]北京空政文工团卫生所,北京100039 [3]第三军医大学研究生处,重庆400038 [4]第三军医大学军人健康保健中心,重庆400038
出 处:《医学新知》2016年第5期349-351,共3页New Medicine
基 金:全军学位与研究生教育研讨会研究课题(2014一般课题)
摘 要:目的:探索心理测评项目对军校医学研究新生心理健康状态的预测作用。方法采用卡特尔16项人格问卷( Cattell's 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire,16PF)、心理弹性量表( Connor - Davidson Resilience Scale,CD - RISC)、症状自评量表(Symptom ChecKlist 90,SCL -90)对237名军校医学研究生进行评定。结果①心理不健康组入学前后 SCL -90总分及阳性项目数差异有统计学意义(P 〈0.05),心理健康组 SCL -90总分及阳性项目数差异无统计学意义;②心理健康组心理弹性总分(73.83±10.21)显著高于心理不健康组(69.5±10.34)(P 〈0.05);心理健康组16PF 人格特质中的乐群性、聪慧性、稳定性、有恒性、世故性、独立性评分均显著高于心理不健康组(P 〈0.05);心理不健康组16PF 人格特质量表中敏感性、幻想性、忧虑性、紧张性显著高于心理健康组(P 〈0.05);③心理弹性及乐群性、稳定性、世故性、敏感性、忧虑性、紧张性能有效预测心理健康状态,总解释率为41.9%。结论心理弹性评定量表、16PF 人格量表中的乐群性、稳定性、世故性、敏感性、忧虑性、紧张性可以作为心理健康的预测因子。Objective To explore predictive effects of psychological evaluation project on military medical post-graduates' psychological health status. Methods 237 military medical postgraduates were measured with Cattell's 16 Personality Factor Questionnaire(16PF),Connor - Davidson Resilience Scale(CD - RISC)and Symptom ChecKlist 90(SCL - 90). Results ①There were significant differences in SCL - 90 total score and number of positive items before and after entering school in psychological unhealthy group(P 〈 0. 05). There were no significant differences in SCL - 90 total score and number of positive items before and after entering school in psychological healthy group. ②Total score of psychological resilience in psychological healthy group(73. 83 ± 10. 21)was significantly higher than that in psychological unhealthy group(69. 5 ± 10. 34)(P 〈 0. 05). Social boldness,intelligence,stability,persisten-cy,sophistication and independence in 16PF personality trait scale were significantly higher in psychological healthy group than those in psychological unhealthy group(P 〈 0. 05). Sensitivity,fantasy,anxiety and stress in 16PF per-sonality trait scale were significantly higher in psychological unhealthy group than those in psychological healthy group (P 〈 0. 05). ③Psychological resilience,sociability,stability,sophistication,sensitivity,anxiety and stress could predict psychological health status effectively with total interpretation rate 41. 9% . Conclusion Sociability,stability, sophistication,sensitivity,anxiety and stress in psychological resilience evaluation scale and 16PF personality scale can be regarded as predictive factors of psychological health.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28