音高处理方法的比较研究  

Comparing Study on Pitch Analysis Methods

作　　者：谭菊英[1] TAN Juying(School of Liberal Arts, Shanghai University, Baoshan Shanghai 200444, Chin)

机构地区：[1]上海大学文学院,上海宝山200444

出　　处：《重庆文理学院学报（社会科学版）》2016年第6期44-48,共5页Journal of Chongqing University of Arts and Sciences（Social Sciences Edition)

摘　　要：声调的音高主要取决于基音中的频率(基频),基频负载着声调的主要区别特征。然而处理音高(基频)的方法有很多种。文章以普通话为例,通过T值法、LZ值法和基频直接分析法发现T值法、LZ值法分析声调的结果一样。但是基频直接分析法消除了对数取值本身带来的差异,结果更接近于声调本身。The pitch of a tone mainly depends on the fundamental frequency, which loads the main distinguishing features of tones. Nonetheless, there are many methods to analyze the pitch. Taking Mandarin as an example, by using the T value method,LZ value method and fundamental direct analysis it shows that the result of the tones between T value method and LZ value method are the same. But the pitch direct analysis method eliminates the differences of the logarithmic values and the result is more close to the tone itself.

关 键 词：声调 声学语音学 T值 LZ值法 基频直接分析法 

分 类 号：H172.3[语言文字—汉语]