检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]苏州大学附属第一医院心内科,江苏苏州215006
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2016年第30期83-85,共3页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的总结孤立性左主干狭窄病变患者的临床特点及预后。方法回顾性分析2010年1月-2016年6月于我院心内科住院行冠脉造影术并诊断为孤立性左主干狭窄的患者,比较开口病变组和非开口病变组的临床特点及预后。结果 13 618例行冠脉造影患者中共24例(0.18%)诊断孤立性左主干狭窄,其中开口病变组13例(54.2%)、非开口病变组11例(45.8%),两组分别有12例和8例接受了支架植入术,平均近2年的随访期内无死亡病例。相比非开口病变组,开口病变组女性比例高、高密度脂蛋白更低,而在其他临床特征、血运重建方式、短期及远期预后上差异无统计学意义。结论孤立性左主干狭窄病变患者在接受支架植入术后短期及远期预后较好。Objective To summarize the clinical features and prognosis of patients with isolated left main stenosis. Methods Patients hospitalized for coronary angiography and diagnosed with isolated LMCA stenosis in the cardiology department from January 2010 to June 2016 were reviewed retrospectively. Comparisons between patients with ostial and nonostial stenosis in clinical features and prognosis were conducted. Results Among 13 618 patients who underwent coronary angiography, 24 patients(0.18%) were diagnosed with isolated LMCA stenosis 13 ostial stenosis(54.2%) and 11 nonostial stenosis(45.8%). 12 cases in ostial stenosis group and 8 cases in nonostial stenosis group received stent implantation, and no one died in almost two-years follow-up. Compared with nonostial stenosis, patients with ostial lesions had more females and low HDL-C level. Other clinical characteristics, short and long-time outcomes were similar between two groups. Conclusion Patients with isolated left main stenosis underwent short and long-term prognosis after stent implantation.
分 类 号:R543[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33