检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:周西[1]
机构地区:[1]河南省人民医院呼吸内科,河南郑州450000
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2016年第30期223-224,共2页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的探讨个体化护理干预对重症肺炎患者生活质量及护理满意度的影响。方法抽取我院接收的64例重症肺炎患者,随机分为研究组与对照组,各32例。对照组实施常规护理,研究组在常规护理基础上实施个体化护理。对比护理前后两组生活质量评分变化和护理满意度。结果护理前两组生活质量评分对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),护理后研究组优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组护理满意度93.75%高于对照组的68.75%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论对重症肺炎患者实施个体化护理干预可有效改善其生活质量,提高护理满意度。Objective To explore the effect of individualized nursing intervention on the quality of life and nursing satisfaction of patients with severe pneumonia. Methods 64 patients with severe pneumonia were collected and randomly divided into study group and control group. 32 cases in each groups. Control group, routine care, the study group in the implementation of individualized care based on conventional care. The quality of life scores and nursing satisfaction were compared between the two groups before and after nursing. Results The differences between the two groups of quality of life score comparison was not statistically significant(P〉0.05) before nursing, nursing research group than the control group, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05), the study groupof nursing satisfaction was higher than 93.75% in control group 68.75%, the difference was statistically significant(P〈0.05). Conclusion The implementation of individualized nursing intervention for patients with severe pneumonia can effectively improve the quality of life, improve the nursing satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222