检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《商业研究》2016年第11期75-81,共7页Commercial Research
基 金:国家自然科学基金项目"基于大数据的营运车辆驾驶行为谱特征研究";项目编号:61403288;商务部课题"农产品流通成本与价格";项目编号:46120661
摘 要:本文选取劳伦斯指数和收益性结构变动指数对中国与墨西哥的贸易结构进行分析,选取显性比较优势指数、显性比较优势变动指数和显示性竞争优势指数将中国与墨西哥制造业产品对美出口的竞争力进行对比,结果表明,墨西哥制造业产品贸易结构优化程度高于中国,中国的制造业产品在美国市场的竞争力强于墨西哥。中国出口贸易结构基本完成了广度的升级,现在的主要任务是转型与升级,只有在把握现有竞争优势的基础上合理调整产业结构,中国才能使制造业产品的竞争优势持续下去。The paper chooses Lawrence Index and Beneficiary Index to analyze trade structure of China and Mexico, and selects Revealed Comparative Advantage Index, Revealed Comparative Advantage Change Index and Competitive Advantage Index to make a contrast analysis of competitiveness of China and Mexico manufacturing goods in the American market. The results indicate that optimization level of trade structure of Mexico manufacturing goods is higher than that of China, and the competitiveness of China's manufacturing products in the U. S. market is stronger than those of Mexico. China's export trade structure has almost finished the upgrading of breadth, so the main task now is the depth of transformation and upgrading. Only if we reasonably adjust industrial structure based on present competitive advantage, can China continue manufacturing goods' competitive advantage.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112