检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学,交通运输与物流学院,成都610031
出 处:《交通运输工程与信息学报》2016年第4期1-9,共9页Journal of Transportation Engineering and Information
基 金:国家社会科学基金资助项目(13CGL056);四川循环经济研究中心资助项目(XHJJ-1319)
摘 要:农产品受种植周期长、不易保存、需求不确定性高等因素影响,其供应链管理难度很大。传统订单农业模式不具有柔性,供应链参与各方的利益难以保障,严重制约了农业循环经济的发展。本文以"农超对接"为例,针对由单一合作社和单一企业组成的农产品供应链,提出将基于看涨期权的柔性供应链契约应用于农产品供应链,以提高供应链柔性,增强应对市场需求不确定性的能力。文章在不同市场环境下,对比分析了期权契约模式与订单农业模式对合作社与企业决策行为及相关利润的影响。最后证明,与订单农业模式相比,基于看涨期权的柔性供应链契约能同时提高合作社和企业利润,实现农产品供应链整体绩效提升。Influenced by long planting periods, short selling seasons and high demand uncertainties, the management of agricultural supply chain is quite difficult. Traditional order-based agriculture mode is of no flexibility. The interests of the participants in the supply chain are difficult to guarantee, which seriously restricts the development of agricultural recycling economy. Taking "the links between farmers and supermarkets" as an example, this paper applied supply contract with call option to the agricultural supply chain, which was composed ofasinglecooperativeandasingleenterprise, in order to improve the supply chain flexibility and strengthen the ability of response to market demand uncertainty. Comparing the option-based mode with the order-based mode in different market environment, this paper analyzed the impacts of the two modes on decision-making behavior and related profits of the cooperatives and the enterprises. Finally, we proved numerically that, compared with the order-based agriculture mode, the flexible supply chain with call options could improve both the cooperatives and the enterprises' profit, and realize the improvement of the whole supply chain's performance.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.31