检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨淼鑫[1] YANG Miao-xin(School of Law, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, Chin)
出 处:《北京邮电大学学报(社会科学版)》2016年第5期36-42,共7页Journal of Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications(Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:网络恐怖活动犯罪区别于传统恐怖活动犯罪的新特性,导致传统对策机制失效。加之现有网络恐怖活动犯罪治理手段的失灵,使得运用全球治理模式防控网络恐怖活动犯罪成为必然选择。全球治理模式中的多元主体、多层次防控机制能够衍生适用于网络恐怖活动犯罪的防控。全球治理模式对我国网络恐怖活动犯罪的治理同样具有积极的参考价值,我国应建立多元多层次的防控机制、完善相关法律体系、加强国际合作以有效应对网络恐怖活动犯罪的现实威胁。The traditional countermeasure mechanism cannot effectively deal with cyber-terrorism crime,because of cyber-terrorism crime different from traditional terrorist crime. The failure of governance means of cyber-terrorism crime has made the global governance mode become an inevitable choice to prevent and control cyber-terrorism crime. Multiple subjects,multi-level prevention and control mechanism in global governance mode is important for prevention and control of cyber-terrorism crime. Global governance mode also has a positive reference value for China's cyber-terrorism crime governance. China should establish a pluralistic and multi-level governance mechanism,improve the relevant legal system,and strengthen international cooperation to effectively respond to the threat of terrorism crime.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28