检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:崔铉默[1] CUI Xuanmo(Department of lnterventional therapy, Anshan Central Hospital, Ansan 114001, Liaoning, China)
出 处:《贵州医科大学学报》2016年第11期1350-1352,1357,共4页Journal of Guizhou Medical University
摘 要:目的:探讨支架联合微弹簧圈介入治疗颅内动脉瘤的临床疗效及安全性。方法:62例颅内动脉瘤病例随机分成对照组和研究组,对照组接受单纯微弹簧圈栓塞治疗,研究组采用支架结合微弹簧圈介入治疗,比较两组患者栓塞成功率、GOS评分、不良反应发生率、瘤体复发及死亡率。结果:研究组患者栓塞成功率(96.9%)高于对照组的(83.3%),差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组GOS评分为5分患者所占比例高于对照组(P<0.05),研究组总体不良事件发生率、瘤体复发及死亡率低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01)。结论:对于一般颅内动脉瘤,颅内支架辅助微弹簧圈技术疗效值得肯定,并发症少,预后好。Objective:To investigate the clinical efficacy and safety of stents combined with micro-coil intervention in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Methods:62 cases of intracranial aneu-rysm patients were randomly divided into control group and study group. The control group received a single micro-coil embolization therapy while the study group received stents combined microcoil inter-ventional procedures. The success rate of embolization,GOS score,adverse reaction rate,tumor re-currence and mortality were compared between the two groups. Results:The success rate of emboliza-tion in the study group(96. 9%)was higher than that in the control group(83. 3%),and the differ-ence was statistically significant( P〈0 . 05 ). The GOS score in the study group was 5 ,higher than that of the control group(P〈0. 05),the incidence of adverse events,tumor recurrence and mortality rate were lower than those of the control group,and the difference was statistically significant( P 〈0. 01). Conclusion:For the average intracranial aneurysm,intracranial stent assisted by micro coil technology is effective,which has fewer complications and good prognosis.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249